Focus On Shoe Market Two "Jordan" Whether To Enter The Conciliation Period?
After the meeting, it will face major intellectual property litigation. Jordan Sports In the face of the crisis of listing, in order to resolve the crisis, will Jordan sports reach a compromise with Michael Jordan? This article will explore the relevant possibilities.
First of all, what is reconciliation? There are three logical results in this case. One is that Michael Jordan authorizes Jordan to use Jordan brand. Two is Jordan's abandonment of the Jordan brand. The three is Jordan's continued use of the Jordan brand without the authorization of Michael Jordan. Of the three results, the latter two must be judged by the court, only in the first case, because only the parties have compromised. We believe that the possibility of reconciliation in this case is very small.
First, Jordan has always been dominant in the previous legal game.
Jordan has always been dominant in the legal game before, and may not be authorized to buy Michael Jordan's authorization. According to Jordan sports news spokesman, from 2002 and 2007, Nike company, which had long-term cooperation with Michael Jordan, had challenged and reexamined the eight trademarks registered by Jordan sports, but they were rejected. In 2005 and 2009, the Chinese "Jordan" and the graphic trademarks were identified as "well-known trademarks in China" by SAIC. At the same time, the trademark law stipulates that even if a trademark is registered, the obligee should file a cancellation procedure within 5 years. Jordan made trademark registration on twenty-fifth categories of clothing, shoes and other products in January 2007, and Michael Jordan's prosecution time is 2-3 months this year, which has exceeded 5 years.
Second, Michael Jordan is constrained by the contract with Nike.
Even if Jordan agrees to spend money on authorization, even if the cost of authorization is high, it is unlikely that Michael Jordan will empower him. First of all, it is not a pleasant thing to authorize a person who infringed his or her name. More importantly, Michael Jordan also has a long history of cooperation with Nike's rival Nike. Nike and CONVERSE bought by them have tried to stop Jordan's trademark registration, indicating that they value the commercial value of Jordan brand. Therefore, Michael Jordan's authorization to Nike's competitors may be restricted by the contract of Jordan and Nike company.
Third, Michael Jordan is not entirely hopeless.
Once the court decides that Jordan's trademark will be violated by Jordan and its trademark, the trademark will be revoked. However, it is unclear whether the plaintiff sued whether the name of Jordan company infringed on his right to name. If there is no picture of a ball player, if a Chinese transliteration is not played, the possibility of infringement will be smaller. However, because the trademark used by Jordan company is infringed, the use of its trademark will also have the same intention of infringement, and objectively, it may still cause confusion, and there may also be certain infringement. "
Fourth, Jordan company may not afford to sign Michael Jordan's contract fees.
Although China's sports brands have signed NBA superstars in recent years, for example, Li Ning Co has signed shark O'neal, but the cost of signing NBA superstars is very high. The competition in China's sports brand market is fierce and the profit margin is not high. Jordan is not a first-rate brand. Its products sell far lower than those of competitors such as Lining and Anta. Therefore, it is doubtful whether they have the financial resources to sign Michael Jordan.
Finally, although Jordan sports has passed the trial, it is now being approved by the SFC. However, this lawsuit may have an impact on its final listing, because the situation described in the prospectus of Jordan sports has changed. Its previous Prospectus has the following statement: "the issuer and Michael Jordan do not have any commercial cooperation relationship, nor have they used their image to carry out enterprise or product publicity. The issuer's trade name and registered trademark do not infringe the name or other rights of Michael Jordan, and there is no dispute and potential dispute between the issuer and Michael Jordan. " Now Michael Jordan's litigation will overturn the above statement. Meanwhile, because Jordan's most valuable brand will be greatly affected by the litigation result, its recent listing should be very difficult.
- Related reading
China'S Government And Enterprises Need To Strengthen The Market Counterfeiting Of Fake Shoes
|2012, Children'S Shoes Industry Is The Key To Reshuffle Children'S Clothing Industry.
|- Management strategy | How Do Clothing Salesmen Learn To Grasp The Psychology Of Consumers?
- Market prospect | China'S Textile And Garment Exports Decline And Take Time.
- Clothing store | 中高档服装连锁加盟的选址
- Window display | 中年女装店该如何做好陈列?
- Daily headlines | Dalang Electricity Supplier Center Ranks Among The Top Ten In The Country
- Boss interview | 设计师能否兼顾并平衡“设计”与“商业”
- Wealth story | Tom Ford Will Compile And Guide Second Movies, Nocturnal Animals.
- Industry leader | Yang Da Jun: The Future Of The Clothing Industry Belongs To The Direct Selling Era.
- Design Frontiers | 周翔宇:从特立独行开始
- Entrepreneurial path | Children's Clothing Stores Should Win By Color.
- Attracting Large And Strong &Nbsp; New Way Of Textile In Bengbu, Anhui
- China's Shoes And Clothing Brand Introduction, Entertainment Marketing Is Becoming More Diversified.
- Is It Normal To Quit Skin?
- China Youth League: Win Development With Change
- 36 Domestic Garment Enterprises Operate Headquarters In Stone Lions
- China's Sports Shoes Enterprises Surpass Meager Profits And Survive
- There Are Four Uncertainties In The Current Cotton Market.
- A Number Of Innovative Shoe And Garment Enterprises Operate Headquarters In Stone Lions
- Sports Brand OEM Trade Implies Many High Cost.
- Women'S Clothing, Shoes And Hat Products Become The Most Popular Online Shopping.