Puma FG Has No Suspense Choice Against MG'S Grass Party.

China's grass yard has never been the golden age of long nails, so Chinese people always pay special attention to the types of shoes that match the Chinese grass site.

Pure AG spikes can not only keep the compromise on the site, but also give consideration to certain explosive force, so it has been recognized by many people, but in recent years, fewer and fewer AG have been reported, which has also led to complaints.

At that time, PUMA made MG reappear again, which attracted everyone's attention at once.

Today we are going to introduce the two versions of the new generation of Future 2.1 FG and MG.

When ADI and Nike are still playing the world cup color matching, PUMA has been upgrading their products one step earlier. For one thing, PUMA is really different.

From the top view, the FG and MG versions of the two versions are basically the same. Therefore, the top version of Future is only replaced by the big bottom, and the rest is unchanged, even the last ones are shared.

The Future 2.1 FG and MG versions of the shoe side lines continued the previous work and did not make any major changes.

Today, as the fabric material becomes popular, the flagship shoe must have a shoe collar which is not only low in price. Future has continued the deep and V shoe collar inside and outside the symmetry. This structure has a great advantage in wear and convenience in relation to the middle and high side of the flat mouth.

The Tiffany blue and the black shading silver gray matching color are also the main color matching of the 2018 Russian World Cup launched by PUMA. The feeling is very fashionable. The German team's face value, representing Royce, also appeared early in the national team training.

On both sides of the shoe, there is a puma LOGO leaping out of the heel, but the rest do not have many brand names.

Because of the difference in the structure of the studs, two pairs are formed.

There is a clear difference in the curvature of the toe of the shoe.

The FG version can see a typical upturned radian, but MG is much lower.

However, the shape of the toe space of the two pairs of shoes is more round and high, so there is no need to worry about its shoe toe volume.

This angle can more directly reflect the toe trend of two spikes.

What's interesting is that because the silver area is already strengthened by double layer hot melt film, the two pairs of shoes are all the same on the toe wrapping process.

The difference is that the outsole of MG has a design of the upper edge extending to the toe of the shoe. This kind of processing is still expected, compared with the MG version.

The direction of the new Future shoe upper material has not changed, that is, the thickness of the hot-melt film has increased. The most intuitive embodiment is that the vamp is hard and thick, and durability and protection have been improved.

The design of the new generation of Future is not very satisfactory. It is the V reinforcing bar underneath the fabric collar, which is also a suture for evoKnit fabric collar and other materials.

Compared with the previous generation, its tongue area has been shortened, resulting in less space for the stretching of the tongue, and the V bar is just stuck to the highest point of the instep, which does not possess any elastic force. If you are a high foot, the upper foot will have a more obvious feeling of oppression.

There is a pparent hot melt film area between the light blue mesh shoe upper and the silver hot-melt film, which is a single layer covering.

The Netfit grid on the vamp can be said to be the most important design and concept of PUMA in recent years.

The idea is to give full play to individual imagination and to use the grid to stretch and combine multiple possibilities to achieve the goal of customization.

Compared with the previous generation, the Netfit mesh of the new generation of Future vamp has no change in material. It is also a high-strength engineering mesh rope, but the new generation in the shape becomes a diamond lattice, which is different from the previous generation of honeycomb hexagonal lattices.

The structure of the heel is the same. The built-in protective cup is covered with a large area of hot melt film. There is a perforated handle pull ring in the middle. Below it can be seen that there are small bulges in all directions, with white Future on the top.

Due to the difference in the height of the spikes, the MG version is a little shorter than FG.

In this big grass dominated environment, who can make people's satisfaction with the grass shoes nails, who can win everyone's favor, there is no doubt that PUMA re - sacrifice MG this killer has achieved remarkable results!

The FG version of the solo material is mainly TPU and lightweight Pebax.

MG is a solid TPU material, which also leads to a huge difference in weight in the end.

The FG version of the front shoe pin is the highest: 1.2CM, the heel pin is the highest: 1.31CM, MG's front shoe pin is 0.58CM, and the heel pin is 0.75CM.

In terms of length, MG must be more suitable for people who have complicated conditions in the field. Basically, they can kill most people's pasture lands.

The FG version of the stud layout and structure continues to follow the results of the previous generation. Some stripes can be seen in the space between the studs, and the last two sharp crescent shaped nails are the highlights.

MG is much simpler, and a short, dense cylindrical pin is better than stable.

There is a very eye-catching X cross reinforced beam design in the middle of the FG outsole, which also guarantees its torsional strength.

MG is a full TPU material and has a middle floor support, so although the beam design is not strengthened, its overall hardness and strength are also sufficient.

Either in MG or in the FG version, the insoles of two pairs of shoes are the same, the same craft, the same size.

The length of the JP 270 size is 27.2CM, and the width of the front palm is 9CM. Combined with the actual wearing feeling, we suggest that the normal foot will start to be more comfortable according to the normal size. If the standard thin leg can be taken as small as half a yard or so, but due to the V material in front of the shoe collar, the tensile strength of the shoe surface is not enough, and the hot-melt material in the front part of the shoe upper is thickened, so it is not recommended to have a high back and a wide foot.

The light and yellow shock absorption can be seen before and after the insole.

This is more important than other brands.

The MG version is full of palm bottom, and the spikes are dense, so the weight does not take the lead. The single shoe weight of JP 270 actually soared to 291 grams! It is heavier than many TF, so if you want to start the MG version of ououer, you should be psychologically prepared.

The FG version is half in the middle, so JP 270 has a single shoe weight of 244 grams, which is lighter than MG.

Future relies on the Netfit grid to obviously lead other people in the aspect of shoe fitting and personalization.

Future 2.1 obviously made an article on durability. The thickening of hot-melt film on the upper is the most direct feedback. However, I think the adjustment of the fabric tongue is a little radical, and the compatibility of the foot type is not as good as that of the generation.

In contrast, the MG version is definitely the most suitable for domestic grass yard, but the weight is sacrificed too much. If you are not very concerned about this, then the MG version will be the first to be promoted.

FG is the most suitable site condition.